Two
Books on Teaching Portfolios
BOOK
ONE
BUY THIS BOOK FROM BARNES AND NOBLE
Murray,
John P. (1997). Successful
Faculty Development and Evaluation:
The Complete Teaching Portfolio.
ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 8.
Washington, D.C.:
The George Washington University, Graduate
School of Education and Human Development.
Myths
About Teaching
1)
All that is required to be a good teacher is a
thorough knowledge of the discipline
.
2)
How to teach effectively cannot be taught; you
either have it or you don’t.
3)
Effective teaching strategies are generic and
cross all disciplines.
4)
Effective teaching can be measured with a
generic set of criteria.
A corollary is that input from students is
sufficient to assess the quality of teaching.
Purposes
of Portfolios
a)
Documenting teaching excellence
b)
Empowering professors “to gain dominion over
their professional lives”
c)
Helping institutions demonstrate that teaching
is a priority
d)
Individualizing faculty development
Uses
of Portfolios
a)
Receiving credit for effective teaching
b) Improving
teaching performance
c)
Receiving award or merit pay for outstanding
teaching
d)
Obtaining a different position
e)
To encourage discussions about teaching with
peers and mentors
f)
To encourage discussion about professional growth with
colleagues, chairs, & deans
g) To
encourage reflection about professional growth
h)
To
facilitate
tenure and promotion decisions (controversial)
What
Goes Into a Teaching Portfolio?
First,
decide how the portfolio will be organized.
Two possible ways:
I.
Philosophy of teaching:
this type would contain
1)
statement of philosophical beliefs about
teaching and learning
2)
evidence of how you put your beliefs into
practice in and out of the classroom
3)
reflection on how behaviors are congruent with
beliefs
4)
plan for altering behaviors found incongruent
with philosophical beliefs
5)
strategy to assess the appropriateness and
success of the new behaviors
II.
Past & present/future:
this type would contain:
1)
what you’ve been doing and what you’ve
accomplished during the evaluation period
2)
plan outlining your goals and specific
objectives during
the next evaluation period
3)
a more general plan for the long term
4)
a description of the kinds of support you’ll
need to reach these goals
5)
describe the evidence that would indicate these
goals have been reached
What’s
Effective Evidence?
Most
Effective:
·
syllabi
·
statement
of teaching responsibilities (plus descriptions of how
course was taught and why)
·
student
ratings
·
descriptions
of how and why you changed the class
Somewhat
Effective:
 | scores
on pretests vs. posttests
|
 | teaching
goals for the next five years
|
 | statements
from colleagues who’ve observed your teaching
|
 | videotapes
of classes
|
Less
Effective:
 | statements
by department chair
|
 | record
of students who succeed in advanced study
|
 | statements
by alumni
|
Parts
of a Typical Portfolio
1)
philosophy of education
2)
statement of teaching responsibilities
3)
general goals
4)
match between teaching strategies and both
philosophy and general goals
5)
documentation of teaching effectiveness
6)
summary of outcomes from renewal plans of
previous portfolios (if applicable)
7)
a renewal plan
Evaluating
Teaching Portfolios:
Suggested Questions
1)
Is real evidence of accomplishment presented,
or just reflective statements?
2)
Are the statements of what was done in the
classroom and why consistent with the other evidence
(e.g., syllabi, student or peer evaluations)?
3)
Is evidence of student learning presented?
4)
Is an effort to improve performance reflected
in the evaluation reports?
5)
What is the quality of the teaching materials?
6)
What kinds of intellectual tasks are demanded
of students? How
do students perform?
7)
How knowledgeable is he/she in the subjects
taught?
8)
Are the responsibilties he/she has assumed
consistent with the university’s teaching mission?
9)
To what extent does he/she strive for
excellence?
Ways
to Get Feedback From Students
 |
Formal
procedures like TABS (Teaching Analysis by
Students)
|
 |
Mid-semester
formative evaluations of teaching
|
 |
Small-group
Instructional Diagnosis (SGID): facilitator-led
or instructor-led
|
 |
Quality
circles (aka student committees)
|
 |
Exit
interviews
|
 |
Have
students write the topic outline
|
 |
Collecting
and reviewing notebooks
|
 |
Email
|
 |
Voicemail
|
 |
Anonymous
bulletin boards
|
 |
“Write
a letter to a friend considering taking this
course”
|
 |
Trained
student observers
|
 |
Graduate
students who receive credit for auditing class,
interviewing students, and making weekly reports
to the professor
|
 |
Self-Checklists
and inventories
|
 |
Audiotapes
and Videotapes
|
 |
Colleagues
|
 |
Trained
faculty development observers
|
 |
Trained
faculty observers
|
 |
Paired
colleagues
|
 |
Review
of written work submitted to another professor
|
Validity
of Peer Observation
They
say research suggests that peers can effectively rate:
1)
mastery of course content
2)
selection of course content
3)
course organization
4)
appropriateness of course objectives
5)
appropriateness of instructional materials
6)
appropriateness of evaluative devices
7)
appropriateness of methodology used to teach
specific content areas
8)
commitment to teaching and concern for student
learning
9)
student achievement, based on performance on
exams and projects
10)
support of departmental instructional efforts
BOOK
TWO
BUY THIS BOOK FROM BARNES AND NOBLE
Seldin,
Peter (1997). The
teaching portfolio: A practical guide to improved
performance and promotion/tenure decisions (2nd
Ed.). Bolton,
MA: Anker Publishing.
Uses
 | apply
for new positions
|
 | tenure,
promotion, and post-tenure review
|
 | seek
teaching awards or grants
|
 | share
expertise with less experienced faculty
|
 | leave
a written legacy
|
 | provide
teaching tips
|
 | self-reflection
|
 | document
evolution of teaching
|
What
it’s NOT
An
exhaustive compilation of all documents and materials
that bear upon teaching performance.
What
it IS
 | Selected
information on teaching effectiveness
|
 | Solid
evidence of their effectiveness
|
Appendices
Put
your evidence in appendices and weave
references/descriptions into the body of documents
contained in unified essays.
Keep your appendices of manageable size by
adhereing to two principles:
integrity and lucidity.
However, don’t let your appendices drive your
portfolio: i.e.,
don’t gather just the evidence you have at hand and
create the portfolio around it.
Seven
Steps to Creating a Teaching Portfolio
1)
Summarize teaching responsibilities:
courses taught, teaching related
responsibilities (e.g., advising)
2)
Describe your approach to teaching: 2-3 page
statement with teaching philosophy, strategies,
methodologies, and objectives—i.e., why you do what
you do in the classroom, with lots of detailed
examples of classroom practices to show how you
implement your claims.
A good place to show your knowledge of pedagogy
and your discipline.
3)
Select items for the portfolio
4)
Prepare statements on each item
5)
Arrange the items in order:
sequence of accomplishments in each area is
determined by their intended use.
6)
Compile the supporting data:
even though not included in the portfolio, raw
data and evidence that supports summaries should be
readied in case it’s needed.
7)
Incorporate the portfolio into your vita:
make a separate version of your vita with a
streamlined version of your teaching portfolio.
The
majority of the book is comprised of sample teaching
portfolios from various disciplines.
| |
Submit
a Summary! |
 |
|
If you've written
summaries or reviews of books on
teaching and learning, we'll include
them here and credit you. You
can email them to us at cogsim@cogsim.com.
|
|
|
©
1999-2001, CogSim
|