|
|
Quality-Enhancing Practices in Distance Education:
Teaching & Learning
Quality enhancing practices in distance education,
volume 1: Teaching and learning
(2000). Jacquelyn B. Tulloch & John R. Sneed (Eds.).
Washington, DC: Instructional Telecommunicaitons
Council.
Introduction
The
project began with a literature review of quality
standards in distance education. Standards were
compiled, assigned to five broad categories, and
duplicative items were combined.
The
Categories
-
Learning goals, content presentation, learning
activities
-
Interactions
-
Assessment/Measurement
-
Tools and media
-
Faculty and faculty support
THE
STANDARDS
Learning goals, content presentation, learning
activities
 |
Clear, explicit, and public learning goals and
outcomes |
 |
High expectations, stated explicitly |
 |
Objectives include both content and skills |
 |
Materials are current |
 |
Structured, sequenced specific learning activities
related to the objectives |
 |
Use of effective instructional techniques |
 |
Learners control time, place, and pace |
 |
Use of active learning techniques |
 |
Respect for diverse talents and ways of knowing |
Interactions
 |
Frequent and meaningful interactions among:
 |
Learners |
 |
Learners and content |
 |
Learners and instructor |
|
 |
Students have opportunities for cooperation and
reciprocation |
 |
Learners’ sense of community enhanced by social
interaction, academic support and advising |
Assessment/Measurement
 |
Performance measured relative to learning goals and
objectives |
 |
Use of relevant assessment instruments and activities |
 |
Assessment activities integrated into learning process |
 |
Allows for student self-assessment and goal setting |
 |
Assessment accommodates learners’ needs and situations |
 |
Students given opportunities to provide feedback about
program and process |
 |
Assessment includes “time on task” measures |
 |
Students get prompt feedback |
Tools and Media
 |
Appropriateness of technology reviewed and approved |
 |
Media and tools chosen based on their ability to
support learning goals and objectives |
 |
Choices are appropriate to target audience |
 |
Choices are accessible |
 |
Design reflects the diversity of potential learners |
 |
Instructional design drives choice of tools and media |
 |
Technology plan instituted (including regular
monitoring and enhancement) |
 |
Instructional design is dynamic (e.g., positive
relationships among methods, content, and
technologies) |
 |
Delivery methods approved by faculty curriculum
committees |
Faculty and Faculty Support
 |
Faculty are qualified |
 |
Faculty properly trained |
 |
Faculty responsible for oversight and quality |
 |
Clear policies regarding ownership, copyright,
compensation, etc. |
 |
Faculty supervised by same personnel responsible for
on-campus programs |
 |
Faculty appropriately recognized and rewarded |
 |
Faculty receive services and support in applied
instructional technology |
 |
Faculty receive services and support in distance
education methodologies |
 |
Institutional policy is adjusted to respond to needs
of distance instructors |
Notes
 |
These best practices should not become hard and fast
“rules” |
 |
It is a mistake to only compare distance education
classes to traditional classes. |
 |
Chickering and Gamson’s “Seven Principles” can be a
useful framework, as is that of a student-centered
(learner-centered) model. |
 |
A
transactional model (i.e., one that analyzes distance
education by the transactions that make up the
educational experience rather than in terms of time or
space) may also be useful. |
(overview of book chapters)
Chapter
1: Faculty Training and Development for Distance
Learning at Northwestern
Michigan
College
 |
Northwestern Michigan College (NMC) uses telecourses,
interactive television (ITV) courses, and online
courses. The college first offered an online CMS (Imbanet’s
FirstClass software) in 1998 and within a year there
were over 300 students in 17 online classes. |
 |
Edwards and Minich (1998) delivered a survey and found
that only 28% of institutions required training (and
only 8% required instructional design support). |
NMC’s
distance learning instructors receive support from 3
sources:
-
Distance education team (trainer, instructional
designer, and admin assistant): instruction and
technical support.
-
Media resources team (3 full-time techs plus part-time
assistants): technical assistance
-
Instructional Design and Technology Center: help with
web pages, digital imaging, presentations, and
computer-assisted instruction.
Training and development is a team activity. The team
uses a consultative approach.
Training
 |
Telecourse instructors receive an orientation session,
complete with examples of good practices. Telecourse
instructors may also get help from the instructional
designer. |
 |
ITV instructors leads two-and-a-half days of training
in an ITV lab. Examples of effective practice are
modeled, pedagogical concerns are addressed, and there
are opportunities for discussion and reflection.
Follow-up one-on-one sessions are available, as is a
“tape and review” feedback process. |
 |
Online instructors is delivered completely online. The
two major phases are (1) planning and design (wherein
the course takes shape on paper) and (2) learning to
use the online software environment (which
incorporates some pedagogical issues in addition to
practice of basic skills in the software environment).
|
Measuring
the Results of Training
 |
Self-reports (via anonymous surveys) of how well it
works for instructors |
 |
Informal get-togethers (e.g., lunches) |
 |
Student surveys: every student in every distance
education class is surveyed every semester. |
Chapter 2: Assessing the Distance Learning Program at
Anne
Arundel
Community College
Background:
The Distance Learning Center at Anne Arundel Community
College oversees over 3,500 students in more than 150
distance learning class sections per year. Sixty-eight
faculty members participate, and 3 FT and 4 PT staff
support students and faculty. Distance learning
enrollments are increasing 10% per semester.
Three
Levels of Assessment
1)
The
Micro Level: student satisfaction, student
performance on learning outcomes, student services,
faculty qualifications, support and policy. Includes
student entrance and exit essays plus pre- and
post-tests for each instructional module in WebCT.
Subjective data include quantitative analysis of class
email, discussion board postings, and chat sessions.
2)
The
Meso Level: uses the Baldrige Education Criteria
for Performance Excellence to assess whether goals and
objectives in the distance learning plan are being met.
Each of the seven Baldrige Criteria is measured in terms
of Deming’s Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle that strives
for continuous quality improvement. Measures included a
structured faculty focus group and a rating
questionnaire.
3)
The
Macro Level: at this level, the program is
assessed as to whether it meets the standards of the
Principles for Good Practice for Electronically Offered
Academic and Certificate Programs (set forth by a
regional body, the Commission on Higher Education of
Middle States Association of Colleges and Schools)
Chapter 3: Enhancing Competency and Collaboration in an
Interactive Video Course at
Sinclair
Community College
·
Social presence is defined as “the degree to which as
person is perceived to be a ‘real person.’” Interacting
with someone helps make that person “real” to us.
·
Fulford and Zhang (reported in Moore and Thompson 1997)
assert that interaction is a critical predictor of
student satisfaction in DE courses.
·
Of
course, such interaction is of even more importance when
the DE class being considered is “Interpersonal
Communication”! Interaction in this course was
complicated in that it used one-way video---i.e., while
students could see the instructor, the instructor
couldn’t see off-site students.
Off-site students need to be integrated into the
learning process to keep them from feeling isolated.
Tips:
 |
ask specific questions of off-site participants |
 |
use exercises that fully involve off-site participants |
 |
create an “in-class” illusion for remote students by
using a variety of camera shots, including class
members on camera, and treating the camera as if it
were a student. |
Chapter 4: Using the Internet to Enhance the Relevance
of Government Courses at
Tyler
Junior College
 |
For too long technology in teaching has been driven by
what’s available rather than what makes pedagogical
sense. |
 |
Most training in how to use technology for teaching is
informal, with faculty members teaching themselves via
trial and error. |
 |
Distance Learning students may be different from the
student body at large, so we should get to know them
and tailor classes to their needs. |
Chapter 5: Involving Students in Government at Tarrant
County
Community College
 |
Students were permitted to turn in assignments early;
about half did. |
 |
The Internet proved a useful tool for active learning
in applying government to students’ lives: e.g.,
contacting legislators, tracking legislation, and
accessing web sites for various political groups. |
 |
They strove to maintain a positive relationship among
methods, content and technologies. |
Chapter 6: Delivering Web-Supported Physical Education
at Tarrant
Community College
 |
The format included interactive web pages, interactive
software, a text, and videos. |
 |
The computer-based course proved much less costly than
a paper-based independent study course. |
 |
Students earn points by submitting assignments from a
large list of activities. |
Chapter 7: Online Assessment and Evaluation at
North
Lake
College
Three Types of Traditional Classroom Assessment
 |
Type I: ongoing assessments with little scoring or
grading |
 |
Type II: assessments that give right/wrong feedback
and count toward the grade, but marginally |
 |
Type III: Major assignments that constitute a large
percentage of the course grade. |
(Case Studies of Spanish, Mathematics, and Office
Technology classes)
 |
Submit a Summary |
 |
|
Want to submit a book summary?
Email it to cogsim@cogsim.com.
If we post it, we'll credit
you.
|
|
|
|
|