e-Learning: Strategies for Delivering Knowledge in
the Digital Age
Rosenberg, Mark J. (2001). E-Learning: Strategies
for delivering knowledge in the digital age. New
York: McGraw-Hill.
QUOTES
 |
"The next big killer application for the Internet is
going to be education. Education over the Internet is
going to be so big it is going to make email usage
look like a rounding error in terms of the Internet
capacity it will consume." |
--John Chambers, CEO of Cisco, Inc. (Quoted in
the New York Times)
 |
"In my lifetime, I've never seen hype and
understatement walk hand in hand. But that's what
we're seeing now. I'm convinced that our
great-grandchildren will look back and wonder why we
didn't get it." |
--Nicholas Negroponte, Director of MIT's Media Lab
 |
"The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those
who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn,
unlearn, and relearn." |
--Alvin Toffler, Futurist
 |
"All genuine knowledge originates in direct
experience." |
--Mao Zedong
 |
"The paradox of our times is that we are inundated by
information yet starved for knowledge." |
--William R. Brody, President of
Johns
Hopkins
University
 |
"In short, many training departments today are merely
using the Internet to increase the rate at which they
"spray" training at employees and "pray" that
organizational performance will improve as a result.
for many trainee departments, the Internet is simply a
bigger hose with which to deliver training." |
--Tony O'Driscoll, IBM's Institute for
Knowledge Management
 |
"When the rate of change outside exceeds the rate of
change inside, the end is in sight." |
--Jack Welch, CEO of GE
PREFACE
 |
Most people believe that CBT is a recent innovation
when, in fact, it's been around over 30 years. Yet
in 1998 most organizations reported that less than 15%
of their corporate education was technology-based. We
must conclude that, despite its promise,
technology-based education has been disappointing at
best. |
 |
Why
This Book? And Why Now? Because the Internet is
fundamentally altering the technological and economic
landscapes so radically that it is now possible to
similarly alter the use of technology for learning. |
 |
However, there's also a danger: if we continue to
focus too much on the technology and not enough on how
well it is used, we will continue to fail. |
 |
The Inevitability of Online Learning: Businesses need
to get information to large numbers of people 24/7,
farther and faster than ever, and do it cheaper than
ever before. |
 |
"The question is no longer whether
organizations will implement online learning, but
whether they will do it well." |
Six
Fundamental Beliefs
-
Internet technology is the key to a profound
revolution in learning, but it is only a tool, not a
strategy.
-
There is an enduring an important role for traditional
classroom instruction.
-
Learning is a continuous, cultural process-- not
simply a series of events.
-
The broad field of learning encompasses more than
education and training-- it is a genuine discipline.
-
You do not necessarily have to be in the educational
or training business to create opportunities for
e-learning.
-
Strategy development and implementation are never
really finished.
A
Strategic Focus
Too
often we become so enamored with the promise that
technology offers that we ignore the climate in which it
will be implemented.
Disclaimer: This is not a "how to" book. Rather, it
is a companion to the many fine "how to" books on the
market.
PART
I: THE
OPPORTUNITY
Chapter 1: Learning is a Lot More Than Training
 |
Learning
and training are not the same thing. Training is the
way instruction is conveyed, while learning is a our
internal way of processing information into
knowledge. Training supports learning but is not in
itself learning. |
 |
An
effective learning strategy must transcend training. |
 |
In
business, learning is a means to an end---usually,
enhanced work force performance that translates into
value (e.g., better products, better services, lower
costs, better competitive position, greater
productivity, increased market share). |
 |
Businesses have traditionally relied on training as
the default way of improving performance, and
instruction as the process that makes training work.
|
Training has Four Main Elements
-
An
intent to enhance performance in a specific way
-
A
design that reflects appropriate instructional and
assessment strategies.
-
The means and media by which the instruction is
conveyed.
-
A
more formalized assessment or certification capability
(at least in high accountability situations)
A
New Era
 |
Amount spent on corporate training in 1998: $62.5
billion. |
 |
Amount spent on facilities and overhead (e.g.,
classrooms): $4.5 billion---an 89% increase over the
previous five years. |
 |
Amount spent on outside services: $15 billion--- a
52% increase over the previous five years. |
It's
clear from the above statistics that companies are
shifting some of their training investments away from
on-site classrooms.
Training Pays Off
According to a 1997 study by ASTD, higher training
expenditures per employee result in higher sales and
greater profits for the company.
A
Transformation is Underway
It's
good that training is paying off. But in order to
continue moving forward in the future, we must transform
our perceptions of learning in five major areas:
-
From training and performance
-
From the classroom to any time... anywhere
-
From paper to online
-
From physical facilities to networked facilities
-
From cycle time to real time
Broadening Our Perspective
E-learning is diversifying, moving beyond courseware and
instruction to the generation and dissemination of
information (knowledge management), as well as
performance support.
The
Internet and Organizational Learning
Today, many companies are establishing "chief learning
officers" or "chief knowledge officers". They are
investing in corporate universities and trying to become
"learning organizations" by creating an environment and
culture that encourages knowledge generation, sharing,
and learning from mistakes.
Three Learner Needs
 |
Access is key: employees need technical
infrastructure, empowerment, flexibility, and time. |
 |
Comprehensive approach: information any organization
should be reliable, accurate, complete, organized, and
labeled for easy retrieval and use. |
 |
Balance: a complementary balance between training and
information. |
Three Business Needs
n
Information: businesses need to deliver the right
information to the right people at the right time.
n
Open
culture: the organizational culture should encourage the
sharing of knowledge rather than hoarding it.
n
Effective technology: companies for Quark cost-effective
technologies that allow all these needs to be met.
Chapter 2: The E-Learning Revolution
Throughout history, a few technological advances have
been "disruptive" or "restructuring" technologies---
that is, have the power to completely alter society.
Examples include the printing press, communications
technologies like telephone and radio, and airplanes.
The web is the latest restructuring technology.
A
Short (And Often Frustrating) History of Technology For
Learning
n
1922: Thomas Edison predicts that the motion picture
would replace text books (and perhaps teachers) in the
classroom.
n
Early 1940s: the Army training film revolutionizes mass
training.
n
1950s: increased use of "programmed text" and "teaching
machines", based on principles of behavioral psychology.
n
1970s: award-winning PBS television shows like "Sesame
Street".
n
1970s-80s: rise of computer-based training (CBT), first
on mainframe and then on microcomputers.
Why
didn't TV Revolutionize Learning?
Because, unlike a good classroom session, it's not
interactive.
Why
Didn't CBT Revolutionize Learning?
n
It
couldn't keep up with changing technologies
n
A
rapidly changing knowledge base often rendered content
obsolete
n
A
lot of it was deadly dull.
The
Cycle of Failure
 |
Discovery |
 |
Hype leads to high expectations |
 |
Initial programs are poor and ineffective |
 |
Disillusionment |
The
Rise Of A Web-Based Learning Industry
During the 1970's, there were only a few pioneers in
distance learning (e.g., Florida's Nova University).
Today, hundreds of colleges and universities, including
prestigious ones, are offering online curricula.
There is also been growth in:
 |
The for-profit university industry, as witnessed by
Jones International University and the University of
Phoenix. |
 |
Course management software like Blackboard and WebCT. |
 |
Learning portals that consolidate courseware from
different vendors. |
 |
E-learning integrated into business web sites as a
value-added feature. |
E-Learning Defined
E-learning is based on three fundamental criteria:
 |
It
is networked, making it capable of rapid updating,
distribution, and share of information or instruction. |
 |
It
is delivered via a computer using the Internet. |
 |
It
focuses on a broad view of learning that goes beyond
traditional training paradigms. |
Benefits Of E-Learning
 |
Lowers costs |
 |
Enhances business responsiveness |
 |
Brings consistency |
 |
Allows customization |
 |
Content is more timely |
 |
Content is more dependable |
 |
Learning available 24-7 |
 |
No
user "ramp up" time |
 |
Is
universal |
 |
Builds community |
 |
Is
scalable |
 |
Leverages corporate investment in the web |
 |
Provides an increasingly valuable customer service |
A
Strategic Foundation for E-Learning
New
approaches to E-Learning (e.g., online training and
knowledge management)
 |
Coordination of E-Learning with other training efforts |
 |
Necessary infrastructure |
 |
Learning culture, management of ownership, and change
management |
 |
A
sound business case for E-Learning |
 |
Reinventing the training organization |
PART
TWO: NEW APPROACHES FOR E-LEARNING
Chapter 3: Why Most CBT Doesn't Work and How It Can Be
Better
Learning at the foot of a master has been around for
thousands of years---call the tutorial model.
But as demand grew faster than the number of masters, a
classroom model evolved whereby one master could
train many more students. Ever since, we have striven
to recreate the quality of the original tutorial model.
Who
hasn't wished to be able to monopolize a master's time,
to benefit from his/her undivided attention? This was
the promise of computer-based learning---a promise that
has gone largely unfulfilled. Why? Here are eleven
possible reasons:
-
The content wasn't any good.
-
The learning wasn't authentic.
-
Form over substance.
-
One size didn't fit all.
-
The technology was a barrier.
-
It
was useless after the initial use.
-
The learning wasn't reinforced.
-
There was no support for it.
-
It
went against the culture.
-
It
was just plain boring.
-
It
was "shovelware".
The
Road to Better Online Training
 |
Goals that are meaningful and motivational |
 |
Learning by simulations. |
 |
Learning from mistakes. |
 |
Robust coaching and feedback |
 |
Expert Modeling |
 |
Learning from stories |
 |
Authenticity |
 |
Reuse after learnin |
Does
Multimedia Enhance Learning?
Adding multimedia to a bad learning program won't
improve it, a fact unknown to many publishers who have
rushed to augment their "shovelware" CD-ROMs with
copious images that have little coherent relationship to
the content. Additionally, bandwidth remains an issue
with most multimedia.
However, when used carefully (i.e., in service to sound
instructional design), multimedia can augment learning.
The key is balance---balance between glitz and
authenticity, between production values and
instructional values, balance between cost and return
and between "edutainment" vs. learning..
Chapter 4: Knowledge Management
Walk
into a strange library, and chances are you already know
how to use it. That's because the card catalog and
classification schemes are similar in virtually every
library. The web is a different story. Search engines
are not nearly as well structured or universal in format
as a library's card catalog system. Clearly, the web
needs standardization.
What
is Knowledge Management?
A
system that supports the creation, archiving, searching,
and sharing of information, expertise, and insight
within and across communities of people and
organizations with similar interests and needs.
Four
Types of Information
 |
Individual |
 |
Organizational |
 |
Tacit |
 |
Explicit |
Benefits of a "Corporate Brain"
 |
Learning: applying information in new situations. |
 |
Vision and action: seeing and reacting to the outside
world. |
 |
Memory: Storehousing the collective intelligence of
the firm. |
 |
Toolbox: Access to performance support tools and
systems. |
 |
Creativity: a giant suggestion box and brainstorming
forum. |
 |
Integration: Bringing together the firm's various
people & skills |
The
Knowledge Management Pyramid
 |
Level 3: Intelligence: at this level, the online
knowledge has become so valuable that the organization
depends on it to operate effectively. |
 |
Level 2: Information creation, sharing, and
management: people contribute to the system by
creating content, thus growing the content database.
Information is kept current by constant updating.
Common tasks are completed online in a manner that is
more efficient than the older non-automated
procedures. |
 |
Level 1: Document Management: putting documents online
and facilitating access and retrieval to them. |
Performance Support
Performance support enables you to:
 |
"Get up to speed" more quickly in a new job. |
 |
Perform tasks that you normally could not perform
without the assistance of other people. |
 |
Perform tasks better without having to learn them. |
 |
Use tools that amplify your productivity. |
Forms of Performance Support
n
Checklists
n
Forms
n
Reference Cards
n
Electronic Performance Suppor
Gloria Gery's Three Levels of Performance Support:
 |
External: Provided externally to a system or process.
Examples include job aids and help desks. |
 |
Extrinsic: Internal to the system or process but
initiated by the user. Examples include software
wizards, context-sensitive help, and templates. |
 |
Intrinsic: Internal to the system or process and
initiated by the system in an attempt to anticipate
problems and adapt to users' needs. An example
includes the pop-up help in Microsoft Office (well,
sometimes!). |
Is
Expertise Always Required?
 |
Training people to become experts takes an immense
amount of time, money, and practice. There will
probably always be jobs where true expertise is
demanded (e.g., surgeons, pilots). But there are also
many jobs where expertise does not have to be
internalized but can rely on knowledge support. |
 |
Integrating Performance Support Into Knowledge
Management |
 |
Performance support and knowledge management
complement each other as well as augment training. If
you're only using one, consider incorporating the
other. |
Community and Collaboration in Knowledge Management
Knowledge management should provide methods that let
people who use content to be involved in its creation
and to collaborate with each other. Face
it---information exchange goes on in every organization;
it's a matter of whether you create a climate that
supports it and makes it more effective.
A
good deal of research supports the value of communities
in learning. For example, see www.wested.org, which
presents work that suggests people learn best when they
can interact with others in communities of shared
interests. The best learning takes place when people
have access to the right information at the right time
and are members of a knowledge community.
Managing the Information
The
contribution side of knowledge management-- the
collection, structuring and archiving of content-- is
more difficult than the distribution side. There are
three key aspects of knowledge contribution:
-
Inbound information management: identify knowledge
sources, prioritize and manage incoming information,
deciding what to publish, tagging, templates, and
cataloging.
-
Purging dated information: preferably by assigning
each contribution a "life expectancy" as well as
tagging it with identifying information including an
expiration date.
-
Benefiting contributors: incentives should coax people
to contribute. Contributing should become part of the
"fabric" of jobs.
Knowledge Structuring Is Key
Many
organizations suffer from "information anarchy".
Information must make sense for users. You must have a
structure for classifying knowledge and do a good job
setting up search functions. To accomplish this, you
must know the content domain.
Moving Problem Solving And Decision-Making Skills To
E-Learning: A Case Study
Kepner-Tragoe, a consulting company, offers training and
decision making, problem solving, and project
management. In response to clients who asked for tools
that integrated these processes into an organization,
they developed "eThink", a software tool with a variety
of different work spaces suited to solving a problem,
making a decision, sorting out complex solutions,
avoiding problems, or taking advantage of
opportunities. the two can be accessed through Socratic
wizards that provide more guidance or worksheets that
provide less guidance.
Knowledge Portals
Portals from the Internet are good examples of knowledge
management:
n
Cars: www.carpoint.com, www.autoweb.com,
www.edmunds.com
n
Finance: www.quicken.com, www.fool.com
n
Consumer: www.purina.com
n
Medicine: www.webmd.com, www.medixperts.com
n
Legal: www.lrn.com
n
Books: www.amazon.com
n
Education: www.education-world.com, www.kn.pacbell.com/wired/bluewebn
An
Example: My Help Desk
www.myhelpdesk.com
This
Help Desk site is organized into sections like:
n
Get
Help: knowledge and information
n
Get
Productive: tools
n
Get
Connected: community
n
Get
Smart: training
Get
Support: human support contact
Get
Technical: specifications and technical documents
Users specify their hardware and software at a personal
worst home page is created for them, with support and
training specialized for their needs.
Information Dashboards
The
government's interactive census web site (www.factfinder.census.gov)
allows one to access and configure census data to meet
commercial or research needs. When you set your data
parameters, the system reconfigure see information for
you (this is both knowledge management and performance
import in one). A dashboard differs from a portal in
that a portal organizes web sites while a
dashboard organizes information.
Decision Support
E-Town (www.etown.com) is a consumer electronics site
that also boasts knowledge management and performance
support features. Its "knowledge book" provides
information on products as well as information on how to
use and troubleshoot them, and its "expert advice
service" ("Ask Ida") queries users and then helps them
make the right purchase decisions.
Task
Enablers
Task
enablers take people to a higher level of capability.
For example, Ask Jeeves (www.askjeeves.com) is more than
a search engine. it uses a natural language, question
and answer approach rather than the traditional keyword
approach. Other task enabler sites include travel sites
like travelocity.com and expedia.com, where users can
search for flights, hotels, and car rentals--- then
order those services from a single interface. Or
Financenter (www.financenter.com) offers over 100
performance support tools called "ClickCalcs".
Other examples of task enablers in business:
 |
Proposal generation tools |
 |
Online sales account management systems |
 |
Automated expense and purchasing |
Such
systems have the advantages of:
 |
Faster task completion |
 |
He
informed process |
 |
Greater accuracy |
 |
Integration with other systems (e.g., allows for
better reports) |
Two
final reasons why knowledge management is so important:
 |
Good knowledge management can reduce the need for
training |
 |
Demand for training tends to decline over time, while
demand for knowledge stays constant or even grows. |
Building a knowledge management solution
-
Determine if the effort makes sense.
-
Understand a community you are addressing.
-
Know what you know.
-
Master the content.
-
Employ the technology of the enterprise.
-
Develop a knowledge structure and test it.
-
Prototype.
-
If you include performance support, it should make
work easier, not harder.
-
Plan for the running of the KM system, not just the
building of it.
-
Work to generate support you'll need going forward.
-
One portal.
-
Don't stop at document distribution.
-
Understand a value of time.
-
Establish key KM roles: e.g., information architect,
editor, online librarian, knowledge owner, content
author, community facilitator.
-
Build collaboration into the system.
-
Balance explicit knowledge with tacit knowledge.
-
Give incentives and reward participation.
-
Finally, though be afraid to "hang" online training
from your KM system.
Chapter 5: Integrating E-Learning and Classroom Learning
The
approaches discussed in the last chapter (knowledge
management and online training) are even more powerful
when combined with classroom training. Now we are
moving toward building a learning architecture.
Questions:
 |
Where is e-learning not appropriate? |
 |
How should e-learning be used to supplement classroom
learning? |
 |
How should the e-learning and classroom learning
components be sequenced? |
 |
How much time should there be between each component? |
 |
How can on-the-job experience be integrated into the
architecture? |
 |
How will the effectiveness of the total learning
architecture be assessed? |
The
New Role of Classroom Training
All
classroom training is not antiquated. however,
introducing e-learning can lead to a number of changes
in classroom based learning:
 |
The classroom may no longer be the default delivery
system. |
 |
Less teaching, more facilitating |
 |
More reliance on online original source materials. |
 |
Course start and end dates become increasingly
irrelevant. |
Building a Learning Architecture
 |
Conduct a thorough needs assessment. |
 |
Base your architecture design on the competencies you
wish to build. |
 |
Keep the business need in mind. |
 |
Test your architecture assumptions with all
stakeholders. |
 |
Start by associating classroom learning what
application and teamwork, and e-learning with content
and tools. |
 |
Use existing source materials, if available. |
 |
Use the web to link all learning components. |
 |
Help people learn "how to learn". |
 |
Think "precision learning". |
 |
Create and maintain a community on the web. |
 |
Use the classroom has makes tension of your online
learning community. |
 |
An
gauge learners every step away: keep communications
up, communicate the value of the program, provide
incentives for sticking with it, create opportunities
for employers to use the program, keep technological
problems from ruining things, and be responsive to
problems. |
Can
You Put Classroom Training On The Web?
Consider how much of the program is synchronous vs.
asynchronous. On the one hand, asynchronous programs
are better suited to the web, but:
 |
Require a much deeper understanding of instructional
design |
 |
Are more costly to develop |
Synchronous programs have several uses:
 |
Quick applications or process training |
 |
Create greater access to key events |
 |
Learning management |
 |
Community building |
 |
Online conferencing |
 |
Rich media delivery |
 |
Preservation of key events |
However, while synchronous programs provide interaction,
it's usually not as personalized or as casual as in a
regular classroom. If you require high levels of
interactivity and teamwork, a web-based class may not be
what you're looking for.
Killer Apps in E-Learning
The
original justification for e-learning was to make
learning better, faster, and cheaper. but the potential
also excess to create "Killer Apps"--- e-learning so
effective and innovative they redefine learning in your
organization (or at least significantly "raise the
bar"). The initial development of performance support
was a Killer App; so was knowledge management. Who
knows what tomorrow's Killer Apps will be?
PART
III: ORGANIZATIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR E-LEARNING
Chapter 6: Building and Managing an E-Learning
Infrastructure
You
Cannot Begin Without Access... Or a Strong Partnership
with IT
If
you are going to succeed, the people important to the
success of your initiative must be on board. A failure
in one significant area (e.g., infrastructure, ISP, IT,
bandwidth) can sink you. If there our existing
corporate platforms, it makes sense to use them to
"ride" on the infrastructure practically for free.
How
will you reach employees who don't use a computer on the
job? Kiosks? Wireless? PDAs?
The
Rise and Fall of PLATO
 |
PLATO was one of the earliest forms of computer-based
training. Mainframe-based, it was dominant in its
day, but events (e.g., the rise of PCs) overtook its
leadership in the market. |
 |
TRO Learning purchased PLATO and begin an effort to
turn it around. They upgraded it, replaced the
closed, a flexible platform with an open system based
on standards, and surrounded it with a training
management system. Today, PLATO is once again a
leading educational software system. |
 |
Moral: an appropriate infrastructure almost killed
this meeting learning system, but rethinking
technology and the surrounding environment rejuvenated
it. |
Learning Portals
A
learning portal is a web-based, single point of web
access serving as a gateway to a variety of e-learning
resources. There are portals you buy and portals you
build. a company can set up its own learning portal and
use it to "push" content, while users can still
personalize it (think "MyYahoo").
Learning Management Systems (LMSs)
A
modern learning management system uses the Internet to
manage the interaction between users and learning
materials. It helps management track who is learning
what and keep skills databases. It helps employees
plan, access, and manage e-learning on their own.
Eleven Core Capabilities of a LMS
-
A
common online course catalog
-
A
common online registration system
-
An
up-front competency assessment tool
-
The ability to launch and track e-learning
-
Learning assessments
-
Management of learning materials
-
Integrating knowledge management resources
-
Organizational readiness information
-
Customized reporting
-
Supporting collaboration and knowledge communities
-
Systems integration
An
LMS Should Ideally Be:
 |
Authoring tool neutral |
 |
Vendor neutral |
 |
Browser neutral |
 |
Platform neutral |
 |
Doesn't use client-side software |
 |
Free of Plug-ins (or use one that's ubiquitous)
Scalable |
 |
Capable of working through a firewall |
 |
Intuitive Interface |
 |
Real-time registration |
 |
Tracking |
 |
User personalization |
 |
Robust test engine |
 |
Fast |
 |
Secure |
 |
Easy to upgrade |
 |
Dependent on established technology |
 |
From a stable vendor |
 |
Well-supported |
 |
Reasonable in cost |
The
Goal of Interoperability
Interoperability is the ability of your e-learning
systems to work with each other. Given the current state
of market development, this is not as easy as it
sounds! Most products have consistency only across the
vendor's product lines and are inconsistent with
products from other vendors. However, the development
of XML shows promise and should accelerate work on
standards.
Standards
Here
are some key standards groups:
 |
Airline Industry CBT Committee (AICC) |
 |
EDUCAUSE instructional management systems project (IMS) |
 |
Advanced distributed learning (ADL) |
 |
Alliance of remote instruction authoring and
distribution networks for Europe (ARIADNE) |
 |
IEEE learning technology standards committee (IEEE
LTSC) |
Learning/Knowledge Objects
He
learning/knowledge object is a small "chunk" of
instruction or information that can stand alone and
still have meaning to a learner.
By
breaking down courses into component parts, we receive
several benefits:
 |
we
can build object libraries that allow different
products to use the same material. |
 |
it
make objects searchable. |
 |
costs are lowered because objects can be shared again
and again, even for different purposes |
 |
it
enables customization of learning |
Example: consider what Integrated Project Systems (www.ipspm.com)
is doing in the area of project management training.
they broke their project has been training into reusable
learning objects, and now can use it for multiple
purposes.
Don't Just Throw Stuff Out There
Systems and tools must work together, making learning
more cost effective and easier to manage.
Some
Notes about Authoring
 |
The claim that anyone can author online training is
false |
 |
Using subject matter experts (SMEs) as authors is a
risky venture |
 |
No
authoring tool is good at everything |
 |
Standardizing on one tool may not be a good idea |
 |
Templates can help |
 |
Much of the more complex interactions and simulations
are often beyond the capabilities of authoring tools |
 |
Authoring is just one aspect of building an e-learning
solution |
Key
Questions To Ask About An E-Learning Infrastructure And
Tools
-
What is the level of web access throughout the
company?
-
What is the relationship between the training and IT
departments?
-
How collaborative and coordinated over e-learning
are all the training organizations in the company?
-
Is there a comprehensive e-learning portal strategy
in place?
-
Does the organization have a position on
interoperability?
-
Does the organization have the right talent,
positioned in the right roles, to make the best use
of its learning infrastructure and tools?
Chapter 7: The Four Cs of Success: Culture, Champions,
Communication, & Change
E-Learning bridges work and learning. The best
classroom experiences bring work into the classroom; the
best e-learning experiences bring learning into the
workplace. Note that this is a fundamental shift---you
no longer go to school, the school comes to you.
The
Four Cs
E-learning cannot thrive without attention to the "Four
Cs":
 |
A
Culture of learning |
 |
Champions to lead e-learning efforts |
 |
Communicating the value of e-learning |
 |
A
Change strategy to bring it all together |
Building a Learning Culture
Over
and over again, we see people "reinventing the wheel".
that's because e-learning initiatives are often viewed
as unique occurrences. kept OSF usually, the real
culprit is the corporate culture. Many times companies
invest in technology only to find that the culture will
not support it.
Culture-Building Strategies That Don't Work
 |
Give customers what they want: this may not be what
they need! |
 |
Create and distribute a robust course catalog:
sometimes organizations offer too many classes--
especially when existing classes are "sliced and
diced" into a plethora of similar courses. |
 |
Think of training as just another product and sell it:
sometimes training gets thought of as another business
instead of supporting the main business. |
 |
Make training "free": usually, free training has
little in the way of direction on who takes what. |
 |
Build competency models, but don't use them: most
competency models said in big binders and never get
implemented. |
 |
Call yourself a "Corporate University": just changing
your name isn't enough unless it's backed up with
fundamental changes in the training organization. |
 |
Move everything to technology: ending all classroom
training is not appropriate. |
 |
Mandate training: making people come to
training should be used only for certain categories
like safety training and training to avoid sexual
harassment. |
Culture-Building Strategies that Do Work
 |
Make a coach or the directive manager accountable for
learning. |
 |
Focus at the enterprise level. |
 |
Integrate learning directly into work. |
 |
Design well and certify where appropriate. |
 |
Pay for knowledge: i.e., offer incentives for
learning. |
 |
Everyone's a teacher. |
 |
Get rid of the training noise (jargon). |
 |
Eliminate the ability to pay as a gatekeeper (lest
training become a "perk" for the richest departments). |
 |
Make access is easy as possible. |
Signs Your Senior Leadership May Not Be Serious About
E-Learning
 |
Work is assigned to people who are already overloaded |
 |
Work is assigned to people who don't have a clue. |
 |
Directives are given without any money. |
 |
The e-learning budget is always cut first during hard
times. |
 |
Senior managers refuse to learn anything about
e-learning. |
 |
Leaves it to the team to make all the decisions. |
 |
Refuses to tell his/her boss anything about it. |
 |
Does not a sign any deliverables or accountability. |
 |
Believes that going to training is either a perk or
sign of a performance problem. |
 |
Approves other learning strategies that undermine
e-learning. |
 |
Suggests that employees of the web at work is
disruptive. |
Helping Senior Managers Become True Champions Of
E-Learning
 |
Build a sound business case. |
 |
Use success stories. |
 |
Educate executives. |
 |
Coach executives. |
 |
Overcome prior perceptions. |
 |
Work the politics. |
 |
Ignore the disbelievers. |
Leadership and Communication
Here
are nine steps to follow to make sure that your
communications are well received:
-
Consolidate your strategy development.
-
Trash old communications vehicles.
-
Use the web to communicate.
-
Avoid selling and focus on value.
-
Communicate value from the top down.
-
Build support approach with coaches first.
-
Build and promote an initial win.
-
Control external messages.
-
Encourage web savvy.
Four
Additional Rules of Change
-
Don't put change management off until deployment.
-
One size doesn't fit all.
-
Focus on change from start to finish-- and beyond.
-
Be
open and don't over sell.
Chapter 8: Justifying E-Learning to Top Management…and
to Yourself
Criteria For Success
 |
Cost |
 |
Quality |
 |
Service |
 |
Speed |
Justifying e-Learning Costs
 |
E-learning is more efficient. |
 |
Delivery cycle time: even though e-learning takes more
time to develop, completed courses can be taken by
many learners at once, so the overall time to train a
work force is equivalent. |
 |
The financial benefits of e-learning go to the
organization rather than the training department, but
these benefits do not occur until the delivery side. |
 |
The biggest chunk of money saved is not in instructor
costs or travel, but rather in "student" costs. |
An
Example
Suppose an employee's salary plus benefits is 80,000
dollars a year--- $ 348.00 per workday.
A
five-day training class means $1740 in lost
productivity. If an equivalent e-learning class can be
completed in three days, the costs of lost productivity
are only $1044--- a savings of $696. If an organization
has 1000 people who need to be trained, the cumulative
savings are $696,000.
Demonstrating E-Learning Quality
 |
Level one: reaction ("smile sheets") |
 |
Level two: learning (assessment results) |
 |
Level three: performance (better and/or fast
productivity) |
 |
Level four: results (the contribution to business
effectiveness) |
Evaluating E-Learning Service
How
accessible is the-learning program?
Evaluating E-Learning Speed
Sponsored is the system to the changing demands of the
business and the changing requirements of its
employees? That is,
 |
How quickly can it be up and running? |
 |
How quickly can every Jeffrey one? |
 |
How quickly can it be changed or revised? |
Two
Questions Every Training Organization Asks… But Perhaps
Shouldn't
-
How many hours of development time does it take to
deliver one hour of e-learning?
-
What percentage of all our training should be
technology-based?
These are poor questions because the answer to them is
almost always "It Depends".
The
E-Learning Value Proposition
Here
is the formula for the value of e-learning: Cost
efficiency + quality + service + speed = value
Chapter 9: Reinventing the Training Organization
Signs The Training Department May Not Be Truly
Interested In E-Learning
 |
"We're studying it" |
 |
"Nobody's asking for it" |
 |
"Our e-learning strategy is posted on our web site" |
 |
"We've got a couple of pilot projects going" |
 |
"We're waiting for approval" |
 |
"We're waiting for the technology to improve" |
 |
"We're not sure if this is here to stay" |
 |
"It will hurt our classroom business" |
 |
"Let's see who else is doing it" |
 |
"Our instructors or against it" |
 |
"Our students don't want it" |
 |
"You can't learn at the worksite---that's why we have
a training center" |
 |
"We can't afford it" |
Example: at Microsoft, Bill Gates reported in 1999 that
online training usage increased five times faster than
classroom training, and that twice as much online
training is offered than classroom training.
Can
Training Organizations Change?
Factors that help resist change to e-learning include:
 |
There is a long and reasonably successful tradition of
classroom learning. |
 |
There is a legitimate ego-building quality about
teaching. |
 |
Instructors and training facilities represent a major
investment. |
 |
There is the perception that if employees did new one
classroom training, they wouldn't come. |
A
New Business Model for E-Learning
|
OLD |
NEW |
|
Training leadership and staff are transferred to
e-learning |
E-learning group recruits own leadership and
staff |
|
Line item in annual training budget |
Multiyear investment |
|
Economic model based on cost recovery |
Economic model based on investment in critical
programs |
|
Funding requests balanced with other training
programs |
Funding request evaluated only regarding
objectives of e-learning |
|
Reports to have training organization |
Reports to separate governance board |
|
Held to the same accounting measures as the rest
of the training department |
Evaluated by new measures of performance |
|
Focused on developing solutions for current
needs |
Focused on current and anticipated needs. |
|
Considered part of training org. regarding
budget cuts |
Considered separately for budget cuts |
|
Training operations either centralized or
decentralized |
Key function centralized, content decentralized |
|
|
|
|
|
Well, that’s it for the summary. Here are other topics
and chapters in the book:
 |
Re-examining facilities |
 |
Outsourcing |
 |
Professional development and recruitment |
 |
Chapter 10: Navigating the Vendor Marketplace |
 |
Chapter 11: E-Learning on a Shoestring |
 |
Chapter 12: Creating Your E-Learning Strategy |
 |
Chapter 13: the Future of E-Learning |
 |
Submit a Summary |
 |
|
Want to submit a book summary?
Email it to cogsim@cogsim.com.
If we post it, we'll credit
you.
|